News
Offshore Airport Idea Resurfaces Jan 25, 2007 The Log
Offshore Airport Idea Resurfaces
By
Jack Innis
Though some see the concept of a floating airport in San Diego as a
viable alternative, its presence might not be welcomed by some boaters.
SAN DIEGO - The idea of a floating airport several miles off the San
Diego coast resurfaced recently - but power- and sailboaters might be at odds
over its existence.
The swell- and wind-shadow cast by such a two-mile-long floating "island"
could please powerboaters, but be despised by sailors thirsty for wind.
The concept of moving San Diego's cramped Lindberg Field offshore was first
broached by a company called Float Inc. in the early 1990s. The idea recently
resurfaced when Encinitas attorney Adam Englund unveiled a plan of his own.
Under Englund's Euphlotea Inc. plan, the airport would float about 10 miles
offshore on a series of interconnecting box-like structures that are the
brainchild of Oceanside inventor Craig Lang, according to a recent article in
the North County Times. Airline passengers and freight would be ferried
to and from the platform by a fleet of service boats.
In contrast, the Float Inc. plan would position the airport approximately
three miles off the tip of Point Loma. A tunnel would connect the facility to
land.
Both designs would likely allow the airport to operate in all but the most
extreme wave events. Visibility issues caused by fog may be slightly exacerbated
offshore.
But it's possible neither plan would be embraced by San Diego-area sailors.
Mission Bay Yacht Club member Cindy Vanderspek believes the structure's
potential wind shadows might interfere with sailing.
"We sail from Mission Bay to San Diego Bay quite often, and depending upon
where it is sited, it may cause a problem for us," Vanderspek said. "In fact, my
husband right now is off Point Loma aboard a race committee boat."
Vanderspek said several races might be affected, including the Baja Ha-Ha
Rally and the Newport to Ensenada Race.
Conversely, a floating airport might attract fish, which would seem to be a
positive to anglers. But the structure might bring more with it than a resident
fish population.
"You'd have to consider that there might be pollution caused by jet fuel and
the navigation hazards," said Dan Correll of Fishermen's Landing. "There might
be a huge security zone around it, too."
But a floating airport's benefits to the region might outweigh disadvantages
anticipated by boaters.
San Diego's Lindberg Field has no more room to expand. Recent projections
show that within a few years, the city will completely outgrow the single-runway
facility. Nearly two-dozen studies have been completed over the past two decades
for an alternate site, and a consensus cannot be reached as to a new location.
Virtually every available alternative has been assailed by nearby residents who
fear that a change in environment might negatively affect their quality of life
and property values.
While a floating airport would obviate the need for a huge tract of prime San
Diego real estate, estimates to construct such a facility run as high as $20
billion. But a floating airport could feasibly be built using today's
technology.
Lang recently embarked upon a three-year adventure in China where he and a
partner intend to build four of his semi-submersible platforms on spec for the
oil industry, according to the North County Times.
Several years ago, Float Inc. received $1.5 million contract with the Defense
Advanced Research Project Agency for numeric modeling and a series of wave tank
tests for its design. The test results were better than expected and led to
cost-saving improvements, according to company literature.
Exploring the next frontier Jan 14, 2007 Union Tribune
Lawyer hopes idea gets serious look
By
Alex Roth
ENCINITAS – Forget for a moment all the logistical issues associated with
building a massive airport in the Pacific Ocean. The biggest hurdle of all might
be selling a skeptical public on the idea.

DON KOHLBAUER / Union-Tribune
Encinitas lawyer Adam Englund has devised a plan to build a
floating airport about 10 miles off Point Loma. Englund's proposal has been met
with skepticism. |
Would people really be willing
to take a 10-mile boat ride on the high seas to catch a plane? Would any
politician approve a concept so futuristic that it seems lifted from the script
of a bad Kevin Costner movie?
Adam Englund – an Encinitas lawyer and former actor who has been fixated for
decades on the idea of a floating airport – might be a dreamer but he isn't a
fool. Englund understands the obstacles he faces, the odds he is up against, the
fact that others before him have promoted the same idea without success.
But San Diego needs a bigger airport, that much seems clear. And what Englund
is wondering is this: Does anybody have a better idea?
More than two months after voters rejected a proposition to build a new
airport at Miramar Marine Corps Air Station, Englund remains hard at work,
seeking permits, talking to consultants, fiddling with graphics on his laptop,
pitching his idea to anyone willing to listen.
It matters little to him, he insists, that the San Diego County Regional
Airport Authority has all but rejected the concept. He is undaunted by the
various engineering challenges, such as how to cope with fog, large waves,
shifting tides and the corrosive properties of seawater.
It's time, he insists, for San Diego – a community of brilliant scientific
minds – to start thinking outside the box. He notes that several well-regarded
scientists, including one of the world's leading oceanographers, think a
floating airport is every bit as achievable as putting a man on the moon.

Euphlotea Inc.
An artist's rendering of what a floating airport could look
like off the coast of San Diego. The city appears to have run out of
alternatives to Lindbergh Field, which has one
runway. |
“We are so constrained by the land and
yet there's this enormous frontier out there,” Englund said.
In some ways, the idea has a simple appeal to it. An off-shore airport
wouldn't encroach on any neighborhoods, wouldn't subject anybody's house to
foundation-rattling noises. Pilots could land without being forced to navigate
around tall buildings and other obstructions.
And the bottom line, proponents argue, is that San Diego appears to have run
out of alternatives to the city's current airport, Lindbergh Field, which has
one runway.
Englund – founder and executive director of a company named Euphlotea
(pronounced you-flo-tee-uh) – isn't the first person to pitch the concept to San
Diego airport officials. A company named Float Inc., led by San Diego architect
and engineer Don Innis, proposed an off-shore airport in the mid-1990s. Innis
noted that “everything of any worth in this civilization at one point has never
been done before.”
Among the experts Innis consulted was Walter Munk, a world-renowned scientist
at the Scripps Institution of Oceanography in La Jolla. Float Inc. went so far
as to patent the design for a giant platform that hovers above the ocean,
supported by air. The proposal called for an underwater tunnel that would link
the airport to the shore.
Although the group failed to win any converts at the San Diego Regional
Airport Authority, Innis and Munk remain convinced their idea was realistic.
“We're not crackpots, and I'm annoyed they didn't take us more seriously,”
Munk, an expert in oceanography and geophysics, said in a recent interview.
Airport
Authority officials insist they've kept an open mind when considering the
off-shore airport proposals from Float Inc. and Euphlotea.
Keith Wilschetz, the authority's director of airport systems planning, thinks
such an idea actually might be workable in 20, 30, 40 years. But at the moment,
Wilschetz notes, the scientific principles still are untested.
Although Japanese engineers have experimented with a floating runway, the
world has never seen a floating commercial airport. Given the potential cost of
such a project – perhaps $20 billion – there are simply too many unknowns,
Wilschetz said. For this reason, the authority has rejected the idea, at least
for now.
“Maybe it would work on a computer,” Wilschetz said. “But do we want to
dedicate $20 billion to that risk?”
Englund still harbors hope that someone – if not the Airport Authority then
maybe the Federal Aviation Administration – will give his plan a serious look,
especially now that the Miramar site has been rejected.
Over the years, Englund has spoken with any number of experts, including
Frieder Seible, dean of University of California San Diego's school of
engineering. Among Seible's other credentials, he served on a panel advising San
Francisco airport on a possible project to extend several of its runways into
San Francisco Bay. The project is on hold.
“I certainly applaud his efforts because I do think it's something we should
explore and think about,” Seible said about Englund's proposal.
On a recent morning, Englund, 53, sat down with a reporter at Starbucks in
Encinitas to discuss his floating airport. He brought along a laptop computer
filled with high-resolution graphics illustrating various elements of his
proposal.
The plan calls for a number of ports along the coast as far north as
Oceanside, where travelers would be whisked by high-speed watercraft to the
airport, which would be perhaps 10 miles off shore. The airport could evolve
into a mini-city of sorts, with restaurants, a deep-water port for ships, even
housing. The massive platform, Englund insists, could be engineered to remain
stable even in the stormiest seas.
Englund is an entertainment lawyer by trade and a former Hollywood actor
whose film credits include a bit part in the movie “Texasville.” He is not
related to actor Robert Englund, who played Freddy Krueger in the “Nightmare on
Elm Street” movies.
He and his fiancée, Victoria, rent an apartment in Encinitas, where Englund
can walk two blocks to the bluffs overlooking the sea. When he looks at the
ocean, he sees a new frontier for humanity, which is quickly exhausting its
existing resources on land. He has been obsessed with the idea of a giant
floating city ever since he worked at an oceanic institute in Hawaii after high
school.
“Some people want to be firemen and save people,” Englund said. “This has
always been my dream.”
He believes his biggest obstacle is overcoming the natural human instinct to
be skeptical of anything that has never been done before. What's more, people
have all sorts of phobias that would come into play – fear of getting seasick,
fear of landing on the equivalent of a humongous aircraft carrier, fear of
drowning.
He also will face resistance from those who believe humans have no business
trying to develop the ocean. If we build a floating airport, this thinking goes,
can floating strip malls be far behind?
Englund says his airport would be nothing more than a thin strip on the
horizon off the San Diego coast. He says the environmental impact would be
minimal.
This is a workable idea, he insists – it really is.
“I don't want to be thought of as a dreamer,” he said.
Alex Roth:
(619) 542-4558;
alex.roth@uniontrib.com
Floating an idea May 6, 2006 North County Times
Floating an idea: Oceanside inventor off to China in venture to make next generation of oil platforms
By
Gary Warth
OCEANSIDE ---- San Diego may never have a floating airport off its coast, but
the Oceanside inventor behind much of the design concept for the plan may be
about to show the world a cheaper, faster and better way of building oil
platforms.
Variations of Craig Lang's boxlike concept already can be seen
in some of the newest platforms launched by oil companies. His own company,
Seaways Engineering, has never built a platform itself, but a joint venture with
a Chinese company is about to change that.
Lang and his wife left their Oceanside home Sunday for a three-year venture
in China, where he will work for Brian Chang, owner of Yantai-Raffles Shipyard
in the Shadong Province of China.
 |
Oceanside inventor Craig Lang admires the model he used to demonstrate how a
floating airport could be built off the coast of San Diego. He has since turned
the model into a bookcase in his garage. GARY WARTH Staff
Photographer
|
The joint venture between Seaways Engineering and Chang's company will create
four semisubmersible platforms that will be built on
spec.
Yantai-Raffles/Seaways will build platforms based on a design Lang
created about 20 years ago. While earlier attempts at striking deals with oil
companies fell through, Lang said he has seen versions of his design used in
some recently built platforms.
"They're sailing pretty close to the
wind," he said when asked if he thought the platforms infringe on the rights he
holds to the design. "What can you do? I don't want to come up against a battery
of (oil company) lawyers."
Before his company went bankrupt in the late
1980s, Lang said, he and his partner were on the verge of convincing major oil
companies that the Seaway design was the wave of the future. In an industry that
is not quick to adopt changes, one of the major obstacles Lang faced was
convincing oil executives that his design could, in just 14 months, produce a
platform that was stronger and more stable than conventional platforms that take
three years to build and cost three times as much.
"The problem I had in
1987 was nobody could believe the cost could be this low," Lang
said.
Lang created a similar design for a floating airport proposed for
off the coast of San Diego. Working with Encinitas attorney Adam Englund, Lang
designed a series of interconnecting boxlike structures to support the runways.
Last September, he demonstrated for the press the concept at Escondido's
Offshore Model Basin, where he floated a plastic model of the airfield. No
decision about where to relocate the airport has been made yet, and Lang now
uses his model as a bookcase in his garage.
Conventional deep-sea oil
rigs are on platforms attached to two floating pontoons. The platform and
pontoons are attached by a series of diagonal supports made of steel reinforced
with manganese, an alloy that requires specially trained workers to
weld.
The reinforced steel was needed to overcome the multiple stress
points found in the many diagonal supports of conventional platforms, Lang
explained.
Sitting in his Oceanside home office last week, Lang pulled
out a photo of an oil platform built by the shipyard Cammel Laird in England. By
the time the platform was completed in 1983, its cost was $1.27 billion and the
shipyard, founded in 1819, had gone bankrupt.
"After I got involved in
this, I thought there must be a better way to do these things," he
said.
Lang came to the United States from his native Scotland in 1965 to
work in the nuclear industry. His later work included a submarine project, which
led him to jobs in the oil industry, where he helped develop technology that
could create steel pipes up to 10 miles long that could be uncoiled and laid
underwater to flow oil from drilling platforms.
As an inventor, Lang
began studying the design of the platforms and wondering if there were a
less-expensive way of building them.
Lang said conventional
semisubmersible platforms cost 10 times as much to build as ships their same
size because of the specialized workers and costly material used in their
construction.
While the industry standard used a series of diagonal
supports, Lang envisioned four vertical supports. Below the water surface, the
four supports would be connected to one another by steel plates forming a
square.
Lang said the design has several advantages over the conventional
design. First, the buoyant square below the surface keeps the platform steadier
than the two-pontoon design, which made the platform bob like a catamaran when
waves rolled through it.
The supports and below-water connections would
be made of steel plates, material already used in shipbuilding, which is where
much of the cost-savings come in, Lang said.
"It seems almost fundamental
to me," he said. "If you're going to do something around the house, you look in
the garage to see what materials you have."
The steel plates are
re-enforced with box girders ---- vertical and horizontal plates that form
internal chambers ---- a design commonly used to strengthen bridges. Because the
design uses mild steel rather than high-carbon steel with manganese, Lang said
it can be built by regular shipyard welders.
In another advantage he
sees, the simple tablelike design means only four large, sturdy supports are in
contact with the water's surface, rather than a series of smaller diagonal
supports that would be battered by waves.
Englund said he does not know
what technology would be used if a floating airport is ever built, but Lang's
design has made the idea that much more feasible.
"Nobody had really done
any figures to see how much it would cost," Englund said about other technology
that had been proposed for a floating airport.
After presenting Lang's
model and explaining the design, Englund said National Steel and Shipbuilding
Company representatives said the concept made sense and could be built by the
shipyard.
"He has a way of cutting through the (B.S.)," Englund said
about Lang. "When he gets an idea in his head, he builds a bathtub model. He's a
very hands-on practical engineer."
Lang originally formed Seaways in the
late 1980s and had some interest from oil companies. In 1989, the same year Lang
said he made a successful presentation to Shell Oil, his financial adviser began
buying Seaways' debt in an attempt to take control of the company. A dispute in
the company ended with Seaways' assets seized.
Lang walked away from the
business, but he said he bought the assets back in 1992 for $50 with an
obligation to pay back outstanding debts.
So far the debts have gone
unpaid because Seaways hasn't made any money, Lang said. They may be about to
change with his joint venture with Chang.
During the next three years,
Lang said he will return to his Oceanside home every few months, but most of his
time will be in China, where he still is struggling with the language.
"I
can count and say, 'Pleased to meet you,' 'Hello' and 'Goodbye,' " he said about
the extent of his Chinese.
Contact staff writer Gary Warth at gwarth@nctimes.com or (760) 740-5410.
Poll says 66% support airport issue Oct 11, 2005 Union Tribune
Poll says 66% support airport issue but voters unclear on who foots bill
By
Jeff Ristine
Two-thirds of San Diego County voters are inclined to support an
expansion or replacement of their airport, a poll has found, but most are a bit
hazy on the idea of who would wind up paying for it.
A year of aggressive public outreach and education efforts may
have helped push additional voters to support the idea of a new or expanded
airport, according to the survey for the San Diego County Regional Airport
Authority.
Some 66 percent of people polled signaled at least some
willingness to vote for the regional airport proposal expected on the November
2006 ballot, up from 55 percent a year ago. Twenty-one percent said they would
be inclined to vote against an airport measure, the same as last year.
But some members of the airport authority board of directors
were troubled that 72 percent of the respondents believe county taxpayers would
be among those paying for a new airport. Far fewer correctly identified the
federal government, revenues from airlines and government bonds as the actual
source of funds.
"Our outreach is not educating people as to how this is going to
be paid for," William Lynch, an executive board member, said.
The agency's public relations firm commissioned the poll, by CIC
Research, to measure awareness of the airport site-selection program, the
rationale behind the effort and next year's ballot measure.
The telephone survey of 814 registered voters was conducted
inSeptember. The margin of error is plus or minus 3.5 percentage points.
The survey found 88 percent of respondents were aware of the
site-selection project, but only 32 percent - up from 21 percent last year -
were aware of the planned ballot measure.
The airport authority has run newspaper inserts, held a
continuing series of town meetings and passed out posters and squishy airplanes
at street fairs to draw attention to the project, which began under the San
Diego Association of Governments in December 2001.
The agency says Lindbergh Field could reach its capacity by
2015, even with new gates in both terminals.
The authority is using a process of gradual elimination of nine
prospective sites to arrive at a choice for the ballot, but it currently is
focused on just three options: a new airport in Boulevard or in the Imperial
County desert or obtaining maximal use from the existing Lindbergh Field.
Up to five military sites could be analyzed later, depending on
how the board decides to consider them. The board agreed to await congressional
action on a Pentagon base-closure list, but none of the prospective airport
sites were included, shifting the likely focus to the possibility of joint use.
A proposed site in Ocotillo Wells is still on the list but not
under active review. A second, parallel runway for Lindbergh Field has been
ruled out.
The Imperial County site suffered a setback with an airspace
analysis that showed huge complications from its proximity to restricted
military airspace and the Mexican border. Prospective arrival and departure
corridors are so tight, some flights from Northern California would have to
maneuver as far east as Phoenix before landing, analysts said, and a "missed
approach" could send aircraft circling on a 250-mile loop to get back in line
for a second try.
U.S. Rep Bob Filner, who represents Imperial County in Congress,
attended the board meeting yesterday to denounce the idea that restricted
airspace could render the location unsuitable. Filner said the Federal Aviation
Administration should be assigned the task of resolving the issue.
"The FAA's job is to figure out a way to make the airspace
work," said Filner, D-San Diego, arguing that the existing Lindbergh Field
airport suffers similar airspace constraints.
The poll, meanwhile, did not offer respondents a chance to weigh
in on specific sites.
Some 13 percent of those surveyed said they didn't know how they
would vote on a ballot measure until a site is picked.
Among the 66 percent who said they would support a regional
airport solution if the election were held now, some had clear conditions. Some
11 percent of the overall sample indicated they would support only an expanded
Lindbergh Field, said Skip Hall, an economist with CIC Research. Nine percent
said they would support only a new site.
Floating airport idea Sep 23, 2005 Union Tribune
Floating airport idea is promoted
ESCONDIDO – What appeared to be the beginning of a public-relations campaign by a group advocating a $5 billion to $10 billion floating airport off the San Diego coast kicked off yesterday with a demonstration at a business here.
A group that calls itself Euphlotea – the middle syllable is pronounced "float" – maintains that a floating airport is the most economical and best option for replacing Lindbergh Field. Such a concept was rejected two years ago by the San Diego County Regional Airport Authority.
Yesterday's demonstration featured a small model, made from $173 worth of material, floating in a research pool at Offshore Model Basin, an Escondido company that does research on ship and oil platform designs. The demonstration was intended primarily to increase awareness of the possibility of an offshore airport, Euphlotea spokesman Adam Englund said.
Englund, an attorney from Encinitas, said his group wants to circulate a petition for a ballot initiative to compete against the November 2006 measure the airport board is working on. Euphlotea's plans can be found at www.OffshoreAirport.org.
Model Demonstration Sep 22, 2005 Union Tribune
Model Demonstration for San Diego's International Floating Airport
The floating airport advocates are offering the media an opportunity to ask questions and find answers at a demonstration at the Escondido Offshore Model Basin, 578 Enterprise St, Escondido, 92029, at 10 a.m., Thursday.
Craig Lang, noted Scottish marine engineer and naval architect, designer of semi-submersible structures, will show how it all works by floating a preliminary model.
“This is only a technical exercise to explain the needs and qualifications for the port,” says Lang. “A floating airport would be a structure with ample room for innumerable facilities. It could include a virtual mall below decks.”
Offshore Airport Press Jun 08, 2005 Union Tribune
Airport options range from a floater to magnetic levitation
By
Jeff Ristine
Futuristic ideas to solve San Diego's air
transportation needs – one in the ocean, another using electromagnetic
propulsion – took brief spotlights in an airport board meeting.
The notion of an offshore airport, rejected by the San Diego County Regional
Airport Authority two years ago, came up again Monday as the founder of a new
group exploring a "floating airport" asked the board of directors to consider a
collaboration.
Later, the board supported a request for
federal funds to study the potential for a maglev transit corridor, a concept
one supporter believes could link Lindbergh Field to other Southern California
airports.
Adam Englund of Encinitas told the authority board he has founded a nonprofit
corporation called Euphlotea – the middle syllable is pronounced "float" – to
explore the feasibility of an offshore site.
Englund had just three minutes to make his pitch during a public-comment
period, imploring the board to reconsider the concept as part of its search for
a site to replace or augment Lindbergh Field.
If the board won't pursue the idea, he said, his group is prepared to
circulate petitions for a ballot initiative to compete against the November 2006
measure the board is working toward. The airport agency is planning to present
its choice of nine options for the region's long-term air transportation needs
to voters next year.
In 2003, staff analysts said a similar proposal by a business called Float
Inc. posed too many untested engineering challenges, including constantly
changing ocean conditions, high winds and occasional dense fog.
Englund said his group, unrelated to Float Inc., is exploring a different
kind of platform, possibly involving a "huge barge" or a semi-submersible oil
rig. Current thinking involves a location six to nine miles off Mission Bay, he
said, with access by hydrofoil from multiple spots along the county coastline.
All it takes to work on the idea, he said, is $500,000 to $1 million in
support from the public agency.
The board remained mum, but later agreed to support the San Diego Association
of Governments' request for funds from the U.S. Department of Transportation to
study maglev technology. The idea – using magnetic levitation for high-speed
transit to distant sites – has surfaced in two contexts at the airport.
One is an idea for a line on an elevated corridor along Interstate 5, linking
Lindbergh Field to Los Angeles International Airport with stops in Oceanside, at
John Wayne Airport in Orange County and at Long Beach Airport.
The other, championed by U.S. Rep. Bob Filner, D-San Diego, would use maglev
to whisk passengers to a new regional airport in Imperial County. Filner also is
pursuing federal funds for the idea.
Jeff Ristine: (619) 542-4580; jeff.ristine@uniontrib.com
Floating airport idea Jun 08, 2005 Union Tribune
Lawmaker reiterates support for Imperial County airport site
By
Mark Walker
SAN DIEGO ---- A San Diego congressman on Monday reiterated his support for
a new regional airport in the Imperial County portion of his district,
telling the county's airport agency that it risks credibility if it
drops the remote area from consideration.
U.S. Rep. Bob Filner's
backing of Imperial County came shortly before the idea of a floating
Pacific Ocean airport also resurfaced. A similar idea was considered
and then dropped by the San Diego County Regional Airport Authority in
2003.
The authority
has four civilian locations and five military sites that could replace
downtown San Diego's Lindbergh Field, the nation's busiest
single-runway airport. Imperial County is currently one of the
potential airport sites and its local elected leaders along with Filner
are pushing it as a means of economic development for that region.
Lindbergh's
limited capacity to expand has led to forecasts that it will be unable
to handle increasing passenger and cargo demand within about 15 years.
The authority is charged with coming up with a new site or Lindbergh
expansion plan in time for a November 2006 ballot issue.
Earlier
this spring, Filner didn't pull any punches when he appeared before the
authority board to chastise it as it was about to drop the Imperial
County site because that's more than a one-hour drive for most San
Diego County residents and about a two-hour drive for North County
residents. After Filner's tongue-lashing, the board couldn't muster the
votes to drop Imperial.
On Monday, Filner took a more conciliatory approach, saying he wanted to address the nine-member panel in a "calmer way."
"I
would hope that this board would give fair evaluation of the Imperial
County site," said Filner, a Democrat whose district includes that
county. "Let's be visionary."
Filner said the Pentagon's
exclusion of local military bases in a list of nationwide base closures
and realignment recommendations issued May 13 makes it clear that joint
use of any of the region's military bases is unrealistic.
"With
those recommendations, if you had eliminated Imperial County we would
be right back where started 35 years ago," Filner said in reference to
the long-standing debate over a new airport location. "For your own
credibility, you have to keep Imperial County on your list."
The
authority bowed to pressure from area lawmakers earlier this year and
has agreed not to study or discuss any of the base sites on its list
until after the base closure process is complete in the fall.
Filner
also spoke in support of a planned study of a magnetic levitation train
system, that latest development in train technology that combines
electricity and magnets to create a cushion of air on which the trains
"float" or levitate and are propelled. He said he supports such a train
as a means of shuttling airline passengers from San Diego and Imperial
County airport.
The authority on Monday passed a resolution
supporting the San Diego Association of Governments' plan to seek $2
million in federal funds to study magnetic levitation train corridors.
Money
for such a study is in the U.S. Senate version of a new federal
transportation bill, but is not included in the House of
Representatives' version. Filner sits on the committee that will iron
out the differences in the bills and vowed to make certain the funds
were available.
A new airport is estimated to cost somewhere
between $1 billion and $10 billion. It would be paid for through
federal grants and airport revenues with no local tax dollars required
for construction.
Besides Lindbergh and Imperial County, Borrego
Springs and a site in Campo are on the list of civilian sites. Two
sites at Marine Corps Air Station Miramar as well as North Island Naval
Air Station, Camp Pendleton and March Air Reserve Base in Riverside
County are on the military site list.
A North County attorney
argued Monday that none of those sites would be necessary if the
authority turned to the ocean as its preferred airport location.
Adam
Englund of Encinitas told the authority he is leading a group that
wants to get 100,000 signatures of registered voters in order to place
an ocean airport advisory question on the 2006 ballot.
Englund
said the "Euphlotea" idea he is backing would transport passengers by
fast-moving, hydrofoil watercraft from stations up and down the county
coastline.
"We want people to understand that this is an
opportunity for the authority and the people of San Diego County to set
a precedent and leave a legacy," Englund said following his brief
presentation to the authority board.
Englund contended that he
represents a "broad-based, enthusiastic and fast-growing group of
supporters." He also said the nonprofit group is forming a political
action committee.
Englund said he and his supporters are
convinced the technology to build an offhsore airport exists. The
authority considered an offshore site proposed by another group in
2003, ultimately rejecting the idea as unfeasible.
For more information on Englund's plans, see the Web site www.OffshoreAirport.org.
Reach staff writer Mark Walker at (760) 740-3529 or mlwalker@nctimes.com.
Events
Adam Englund on TravelTalkRADIO Oct 09, 2005 TravelTalkRADIO
ADAM ENGLUND joins Sandy live in the TravelTalkRADIO studios in Southern California.
Adam is intent on bringing a floating airport somewhere and why not San Diego. He lives there and San Diego is shopping a new airport facility. From a tour and travel point of view it could mean millions if not billions of dollars in revenues. A terminal for cruise ships and a community onto itself. Plus 6 miles off the San Diego coast it is perfectly legal to gamble. Hmm is anybody listening yet? Check it out at http://www.traveltalkradio.com/archives_oct09_05.html (segments: 4 & 5).
Adam Englund on TravelTalkRADIO Jul 17, 2005 TravelTalkRADIO
ADAM ENGLUND joins Sandy live in the TravelTalkRADIO studios in Southern California.
Adam is intent on bringing a floating airport somewhere and why not San Diego. He lives there and San Diego is shopping a new airport facility. From a tour and travel point of view it could mean millions if not billions of dollars in revenues. A terminal for cruise ships and a community onto itself. Plus 6 miles off the San Diego coast it is perfectly legal to gamble. Hmm is anybody listening yet? Check it out at http://www.traveltalkradio.com/archives_jul17_05.html (segments: 1,2,3,6,7 & 12).